Justin

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 609 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: the exorcism in exorcist III #16261
    Justin
    Participant

    I guess he kinda “glued” to the ceiling and when he pulled away it ripped his skin off. It’s extremely stupid when you think about it. Morgan Creek are dumb.

    in reply to: An ignorant question #16255
    Justin
    Participant

    I guess that’s what the Ouija board/Pazuzu come up with. It’s close to “Howard”, her father’s name, so it was a way for the demon to get close to her.

    in reply to: question about father karras in the exorcist #16257
    Justin
    Participant

    Well I’d say he would have killed Regan and then.. who knows? Maybe he would have escaped or killed Chris, and then maybe Karras.

    in reply to: legion soundtrack question #16258
    Justin
    Participant

    There’s a bootleg version floating around, but I don’t know if that’s just a DVD sound rip or something. I downloaded something that was supposed to be it, and it was just music ripped from the dvd.

    in reply to: Legion or Pazuzu,just who was it? #16245
    Justin
    Participant

    Pazuzu was forced to leave when Karras died, leaving it open for anyone else to inhabit his body… I guess. So the Devil – or some demons (maybe even Pazuzu) helped the Gemini get in, and they share his body. Or it could be just the Gemini inside, with the demons helping him do things.

    I think that’s right, it is all quite confusing. 😛 I am sure it is Pazuzu in the original though. Remember, the demon is a liar.

    in reply to: Exorcists – The “True” Story? #16223
    Justin
    Participant

    This was on TV a while back and I recorded it.

    It’s rather pathetic IMO, if you know the story already there’s not much point in seeing this. The re-enactment scenes are just as bad if not worse than Possessed. And from what I remember, Friedkin wasn’t in this, and everything Blatty (pretty sure he was interviewed in it, but I can’t remember) said you can see in Fear of God.

    in reply to: Happy Birthday! #16202
    Justin
    Participant

    I’m pretty sure you don’t own the newspaper/or whatever company that was printed in. You can’t copyright something that is already copyrighted.

    Plus, I’ve had this image on my computer for ages.. I don’t remember where I save them from.

    in reply to: YOU STOLE MY SCAN! #16204
    Justin
    Participant

    And I’ve made many scans and such that have been used on other sites. Who cares? I don’t own the copyrights to the original item, so I can’t claim it to be “my work” and neither can you. All we did was scan it (and openly put it out on the internet)..

    If you love The Exorcist and Blatty like you said, you wouldn’t care and be happy that you’re making a contribution to the community.

    in reply to: The Official “EXORCIST 2” RE-EDIT Thread #16192
    Justin
    Participant

    As I posted on IMDB, I don’t think it is possible to actually have a story/film without having the synchronizer. It takes up half the film.. Good luck though. 😛

    in reply to: NEW TITLE IDEA #16188
    Justin
    Participant

    Wasn’t it a point in the film that the world is a dominion to our own devils, not The Devil himself? Though one can’t say that the world is only a dominion of evil. And one also can’t say the film is even about the devil. Can you really believe that Satan was locked inside that crypt? It’s Pazuzu.

    Now maybe we could easily just say there’s one dominion in “EXORCIST: THE BEGINNING”, but the characters are not all 1 sided in “DOMINION”. Each individual person (and even animals/objects – the church) in the film is a dominion, weather it be to their own demons, The Devil/Pazuzu, or God.

    Which brings me to my point that the title isn’t referring to just one dominion, we get to know the characters and understand what they’re going through – each one a dominion to something.

    While ultimately it does become a dominion of God, the title shouldn’t refer to the end, because the film isn’t one sided – there’s more too it. Same goes for the original film. Does that make sense?

    in reply to: NEW TITLE IDEA #16190
    Justin
    Participant

    I thought if that too, but then DOMINIONS: PREQUEL TO THE EXORCIST doesn’t sound very good.

    in reply to: New Year Petition? Exorcist III Special Edition? #16181
    Justin
    Participant

    I don’t know if it would be the best idea to do it yet, since we don’t wanna take any focus from WB putting together an ultimate edition of the original film.

    in reply to: NEW TITLE IDEA #16182
    Justin
    Participant

    I think it should be either just DOMINION or DOMINION w/ Prequel to The Exorcist after it. I don’t like the idea of THE DOMINION because we’re not really dealing with one (*THE*) “dominion” in the film.

    in reply to: Two more rare pics.. #16139
    Justin
    Participant

    I think you’ve posted that above pic like 100 times already. 😛 As for the Gab & Billy one, check the site’s image gallery, it’s in there.

    in reply to: New Year Petition? Exorcist III Special Edition? #16119
    Justin
    Participant

    I think all the films deserve a special edition. There needs to be a definitive box set, not just the same old bare DVDs thrown in a badly photoshopped box. And they need to throw as much stuff on it as possible before it is all lost. They could have new documentaries made for each film (would love to see some mini ones done for the troubles behind making Legion, Dominion & ETB), with cast/crew interviews etc. Behind the scenes footage, deleted scenes, parodies (like what was on the Titanic collector’s edition – there’s MANY Exorcist ones that could be put on there) whatever can be found, basically.

    What would be really cool is if they did something like Peter Jackson’s King Kong Diaries for each film. They could get the cast/crew in to talk about everything, showing all the behind the scenes footage from the archives.

    OK – I know that will never happen, but one can dream.

Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 609 total)