ManInKhakiExorcist

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 520 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: EVIL AGAINST EVIL by Michael Garrett (2008 AD) #19696
    ManInKhakiExorcist
    Participant

    Hello, Scrupulous Conscience. Thank you for your interest. Here’s my take, as requested. 🙂

    Unique stories deserve case studies. That’s how observers or employers of a given subject matter can learn and grow, arguably the only way; books teach, and it’s an amazing thing to have so many to choose from — the more unique ones also tend to be more compelling.

    Two dueling Exorcist prequel films. One greenlit, shot, and promptly shelved and replaced with a veritable instant-remake with the same star, select supporting actors, the same sets, same composer, same cinematographer… and months after that film’s DVD hit, the Schrader’s version got a theatrical release and eventual DVD immortalization.

    This just doesn’t happen every day. 🙂

    When people spend $100 million and end up with two films of virtually the same story, and neither does particularly well to make one or both worth all the time, energy and money spent, it’s too good to leave the story confined to a finite, minimal presentation in movie mags that eventually are only ever read by film fans, or skimpy online articles that can go MIA when the subject is no longer genuinely “news”. No. For a couple of such ugly, bad, and GOOD movies, they deserve better; a definitive book as EVIL AGAINT EVIL: THE PREQUELS TO THE EXORCIST will be of great value, looking for the known and unknown story, all 360 degrees of it without hundreds of dollars spent on magazine back issues with only a fraction of the overall story and no further, unearthed genuine, substantial news/insights direct from the testimonies of key players. Anything I can do to indirectly or directly promote the film that started it all, William Friedkin and William Peter Blatty’s THE EXORCIST, the original classic, the better.

    This is a unique episode in the history of cinema, let alone horror cinema. I don’t blame you nor others for not being fans of the finished products — rather, end results — Schrader and Harlin served up. But it’s a compelling case that growing mountains of ongoing research and interviews are proving that the work and intentions by all involved tell a story long overshadowed by the controversy and unintended mediocrity the two films have to present.

    Thank you for your honest and respectful skepticism, Scrupulous Conscience. It keeps us writers walking the fine line, doing our job as it should be done. 😉

    Yours,

    MG
    http://www.EVILAGAINSTEVIL.com

    in reply to: About the Franchise #19681
    ManInKhakiExorcist
    Participant

    EKM, is that you…? 😛

    in reply to: Stage Play #19652
    ManInKhakiExorcist
    Participant

    You are so right, Cap. Nice one! 😛

    M.I.K.E.

    in reply to: EVIL AGAINST EVIL by Michael Garrett (2008 AD) #19653
    ManInKhakiExorcist
    Participant

    Scrupulous Conscience,

    It’ll be play-by-play, every little detail worth mentioning (read: exhaustive), since I’m going for DEFINITIVE here. On the other hand, that — a play-by-play — will be just the icing on the cake (or else I’ll only end up with maybe 20 pages to call a book! No one would buy that. 😐

    It would be unimpressive to just copy and paste others’ reporting. Gotta bring something new to the table. Thus, I’ll be analyzing, scrutinizing and comparing, reading-into all of the following:

    1.Cast and crew testimony (published interviews, DVD commentaries, and forthcoming interviews I’ll personally conduct in the days and weeks ahead.)

    2.The films themselves

    3.A few other worm cans, such as… no, I’ve said too much! 😮

    Thanks for your interest, Scrupulous Conscience.

    Keep your crucifix set to any and all of the following:

    http://www.evilagainstevil.com

    http://www.myspace.com/exorcistprequelsbook

    http://www.captainhowdy.com

    yours, until my body rots and lies stinking in the earth…!

    M.I.K.E.

    in reply to: EVIL AGAINST EVIL by Michael Garrett (2008 AD) #19654
    ManInKhakiExorcist
    Participant

    Captain, I’m optimistic, the same as you. THANKS! 😀 Be in touch soon, incidentally.

    M.I.K.E.

    in reply to: EVIL AGAINST EVIL by Michael Garrett (2008 AD) #19614
    ManInKhakiExorcist
    Participant

    Thanks for letting me spam. 😉

    But seriously, looking forward to being back in the groove here. SOON, my babies! 😀

    M.I.K.E.

    in reply to: The Exorcist Blsphemes the HOLY GHOST of GOD #19536
    ManInKhakiExorcist
    Participant

    You give us Christians a bad name, Glynisbethel. It’s not exclusively what you allow our eyes and ears to be exposed to which might indeed pollute our mind and corrupt our heart, it’s the less-legalistic daily living as Christians more than just in name. We are to, besides on Sundays or holidays, live out daily the example Christ shared with us.
    While you mean well, your methods are not Christ-like, and are not loving toward others, but rather judgmental. Pre-judging them.

    And hinging on a single movie? Listen, while I’m not a Catholic, I actually see more of Christ’s example in The Exorcist than in your post above. The Damien Karras character, in particular, lays down his life so that another human being, Regan MacNeil, might live. Jesus preached this. “There is no greater love than when a man [or woman] lays down his life for another,” to paraphrase. Oh, and Karras succeeds. The mystery of goodness is fulfilled, and the demon is driven out.

    Sure there’s some blasphemus imagery and one-liners, but we’re dealing with a story, a drama, one featuring an enemy of Christ, the devil or a demon — take your pick — and anyway, such a film as The Exorcist is validated in the eyes of God, if I had to guess, because it presents the two-part question to humanity, where a vast majority of our secular culture does not and never would:

    “Are you right with God — and if you are, are you settling for mediocrity instead of His very best life for your life?”

    Films that present good and evil as thoughtfully as this one actually tend to share the gospel better in many ways than an unloving fire-and-brimstone, legalistic, in-name-only “Christian”. And however we receive the gospel — hopefully mainly through the scripture, God’s word, than a filtered version, even one as heavy-hitting as The Exorcist — that’s better than no contemplation of God’s love for us. A love that challenges us to rethink our broken, selfish culture, lifestyles, and yes, lives.

    Please forward this to all who may disagree. The church has changed very much since Christ’s day. Leave it to humanity. But leave it to God to provide His example of how to truly live, for others, and finding true happiness and joy: Jesus Christ.

    Love, not hate,

    M.I.K.E.

    in reply to: My Rob Zombie’s Halloween 2007 review #19537
    ManInKhakiExorcist
    Participant

    GRRRRR… Justy, don’t encourage him! 😛

    in reply to: 88 Doctors! #19539
    ManInKhakiExorcist
    Participant

    RPD… yeah, good one, Cap! 😛 Response Please Damien, now on tour! 😛

    Some others I’ve conjured:

    Chipped Face

    Priest Minus Parachute

    Waddling Detective

    Soap For the Serpentine Tongue

    Airborne Exorcist

    The Burke Dennings

    Bedroom Window Refugee

    Mental Clearance Sale

    Wants No Straps

    Evil Against Evil

    It Wants Mouse Traps

    Brain Legion

    Free-falling Exorcist

    The Swiveling Heads

    Pea Soup & Quince Jelly

    Synchronizer

    Sweating Richard Burton

    The Incidentallys

    Red And Yellow Contacts

    Pea Soup Will Put Writing On Your Chest

    Parker Brothers Are Satanic

    The Barringer Clinic

    George Cobb Scott


    Okay, that’s all I got. 😛

    M.I.K.E.

    in reply to: Not a Remake! #19514
    ManInKhakiExorcist
    Participant

    Cap, if anything, other possession flicks could be covered, reminding us why “our movies” are better, or in some cases worse. But a movie news site, let alone a horror one, I think it could kill what a beautiful thing we have here now which has improved with age, and hits (millions of ’em, if I recall correctly). 🙂

    It’s your website, so you may do what you wish. 🙂 That said, I appreciate your conferring with us before any such overhaul.

    Yours until my body lies stinking in the earth,

    M.I.K.E.

    in reply to: About the Franchise #19515
    ManInKhakiExorcist
    Participant

    Rather than write out the full titles, here are the Aussie slang versions inspired by or coined by the great Justycist (over the years) — with the ratings:

    Exy: 10/10

    Herry: 5/10

    Leggy: 7.5/10

    Beggy: 4.5/10

    Dommy: 8.5/10

    M.I.K.E.

    in reply to: Re: Banner linking to home page.. #19518
    ManInKhakiExorcist
    Participant

    “Love that Jok–banner!” 😛

    M.I.K.E.

    in reply to: My Rob Zombie’s Halloween 2007 review #19521
    ManInKhakiExorcist
    Participant

    I expected more out of something crafted by Rob Zombie.

    Then again, what remake based so faithfully on a classic was ever decent? Psycho, Omen, Halloween…

    Argh-sigh. At least we have the originals and not just the lifeless counterfeits.

    M.I.K.E.

    in reply to: Found this on my 25th anniversary DVD #19475
    ManInKhakiExorcist
    Participant

    Witchcraft, pure and simple.

    M.I.K.E.

    in reply to: Re: RIP. Chicken the cat. 4/16/91-11/5/07 #19476
    ManInKhakiExorcist
    Participant

    Thanks, gang.

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 520 total)