CaptainHowdy.com The #1 Exorcist Fansite Since 1999
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Yes, that’s right. There’s already a topic on the Amityville house on here somewhere. I would also assume the R.E.H. address would fall within these same zoning rules as it is classified as a residential zone.
I did that in Photoshop.
As a postscript, there is not one categorical legal violation of the use of this photo under the Restatement Second of Torts, Sec. a, to the best of my knowledge.
I would compare the R.E.H. house to the one in Amityville. If I owned either one, I would apply for a historical site certificate and open a museum … 😉
Another resource.
howdy, I would just Google both of these addresses. You will get a lot of hits from each one.
The original digital media created from this printed media does not infringe on copyright by any means to my knowledge.
__________________Public Domain/Fair Use/Educational Purposes photo of subject (click pic to enlarge):
The original spiderwalk probably would not have the same impact and, quite frankly, IMHO is quite laughable.
Truly, I’m now of the volition of the rumors that Friedkin thought the scene looked just plain stupid and out of whack from the rest of his documentary-style film. Of course, Friedkin claims it was “ineffective technically” and “too soon” in the film …
Car salesman, anyone? 😉
