[ian.von.battenberg]

I assumed it was a nod to the story of Robbie Mannheim?
He was, apparently, haunted and / or possessed by his aunt was he not?

[ian.von.battenberg]

I thought it was a nod to the story of R. Mannheim? He was apparently haunted by his aunt, was he not?

[ian.von.battenberg]

If this duo had been afforded all the time and money they really wanted, I can only imagine how much more intricate the film could have been.

That's another thing (I may be covering old ground here, I'm quite sure[!!]) but doesn't the ending of the film seem a little 'rushed'? I've not read the book yet (it's the next one on the ever-growing pile [I'm currently reading Thomas Allen's “Possessed”]) so I'm not sure of the exact chain of events, but the actual exorcism is, in my opinion, over and done with really quickly. Does anyone agree?

Were there reasons for this; budget / time constraints etc . . .

 

Just a thought.

[Author]

Posts