granville1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 961 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Legion book: voices of the dead #18859
    granville1
    Participant

    Great catch, Blizzi. Roman numerals “2” for the twin themes is very appropriate. Also – and this is stretching the point terribly – maybe it could also refer to the fact that Legion was the second, “number two” sequel – officially-from-Blatty – to the original novel. (As I say, it’s a stretch.)

    in reply to: Lost Posts #18861
    granville1
    Participant

    Thanks for letting us know, Captain Howdy. I noticed that your post is not listed chronologically. As the newest post in this section, shoudn’t it be at the top of the list as “most recent post”?

    in reply to: Legion book: voices of the dead #18863
    granville1
    Participant

    Thanks.

    in reply to: Exorcist II: Heretic publicity shot #18864
    granville1
    Participant

    Okay – thanks for the clarification.

    in reply to: Interesting Analysis Of The Film #18837
    granville1
    Participant

    Thanks, Blizzi! Nice to hear from you.

    in reply to: Interesting Analysis Of The Film #18834
    granville1
    Participant

    I agree with you, Captain. The online video documentary is useful in showing the striking contrast between the times when The Exorcist came out, and our times.

    While our times would suspect abuse, the late ’60s and early ’70s were more “innocent” in that regard. Unfortunately such “innocence” shielded molestation and other forms of abuse. This trend was unfortunately started by Freud and Jung, who tended to detect “incest fantasy” in all too many cases in which actual abuse was probably the actual cause of symptoms.

    Pertinently, Blatty’s demon is itself a child abuser and (“the bone-white crucifix”) an actual rapist. Regan is Pazuzu’s “honey piglet” and his “pearl”, whom he claims has a “succulent c–t”. With _this_ nasty, evil figure, the novel and film don’t need poor Burke Dennings to fill in as a child-abusing character.

    Moreover, in reference to the difference between The Exorcist’s time and ours: I wonder if Blatty could write that crucifix-rape scene today. Disregarding the pain, blood, and sadism, the scene is a blatant example of explicit child sexual activity. Blatty’s demon speaks with “a throaty eroticism” as the crucifix is sensually stroked in and out of the twelve-year-old’s private parts.

    Such a scene today even if discovered in the worst sado-masochistic schlock horror pulp porn would evoke howls from the watchdogs of public morality. It’s amazing that a book with such a scene has survived without censorship and is available in bookstores and libraries for folks of all ages to read.

    But coming as it did from a public figure whose reputation in film and literature was already well-established, would provoke a firestorm of outrage today. Can you imagine the headlines and headers for talk shows… “Has Bill Blatty lost his mind?… Is he trying to ruin his own career?… No, Mr. Blatty, we will NOT allow your book in our community, and consider your lectures and guest appearances cancelled… Explicit Child Rape Adorns Blatty’s Newest Novel (read all about it on page six!)!!!”…

    Or, perhaps not. After all, the full cut of Leon does have Portman bedding Reno, if only for companionship. And Dakota Fanning’s latest flick has her (the plucky little trouper) endure a molestation scene, albeit acted-out in her safely semi-explicit body vinyl.

    Anyway, maybe times have changed. Or maybe not all that much.

    granville1
    Participant

    Thanks to Michael Blatty and to Blizzi for posting. Great stuff.

    in reply to: Interesting Analysis Of The Film #18812
    granville1
    Participant

    This seems to be the source that those imdb flakes of recent discussion here have been using to trash Burke Dennings…

    in reply to: Horror Hall Of Fame: Exorcist #18805
    granville1
    Participant

    Great find, Blizzi!! Thank you for sharing it.

    granville1
    Participant

    Ryan, thanks for posting the Snyder interview. You and Blizzi are really hot today!

    in reply to: Horror Hall Of Fame: Exorcist #18809
    granville1
    Participant

    Ok, then thanks to our Sofi too!!!

    granville1
    Participant

    And so is Justin of course…

    in reply to: Isn’t it strange that… #18800
    granville1
    Participant

    lunuso, thanks for the compliment… we might be a wee bit sentimental, but I for one might get teary-eyed when the three graves show up on screen…

    in reply to: Isn’t it strange that… #18794
    granville1
    Participant

    Speaking of funerals – off topic sort of – I would have liked to see Legion end in the cemetary with:

    Long shot of cemetary;

    Shot moving left to right thru headstones,
    PAUSING

    At Merrin’s grave (assuming he was buried in Georgetown);

    At Paul Morning’s grave;
    FINALLY

    At Karras’s grave.

    It might make a touching tribute to those three martyrs – all killed while combatting the demonic.

    in reply to: Isn’t it strange that… #18797
    granville1
    Participant

    Hey, Blizzi and Ryan, thanks for your input. What with CGI’s current state, presumably this final shot would not be too difficult to achieve… wouldn’t need to actually go back to the cemetary and re-shoot. Although that would be very cool as well.

Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 961 total)