Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 29, 2012 at 6:18 AM in reply to: List of everything that was left out or differs from the novel #26166
granville1
ParticipantNice work, as always 🙂
granville1
ParticipantGracias, merci, danke schoen 🙂
granville1
ParticipantHello back, young feller – glad to see ya.
granville1
ParticipantSof, I'm sorry to hear that. Not being in the slightest knowledgable about how account authentication works, I can't suggest any solutions 🙁
I guess we'll have to stick to Everything Exorcist for news and communication….
granville1
ParticipantI wouldn't think living in Portugal would be a problem, but I don't know. Imdb gets plenty of posters from Britain, so I'd presume it's available to all countries that have cables and internet connections. Maybe it IS some weird cell phone issue, but that makes no sense to me – a phone number is a phone number. Best of luck getting into the site – you'd be a hugely valued contributor.
granville1
ParticipantSorry your account doesn't work 🙁
Maybe there is a way you can contact the administrators? I really don't know how imdb's “internal stuff” works.
I don't know why the imdb board is busier than this one. Occasionally when I'm on imdb I will strongly recommend captainhowdy.com/Everything Exorcist, but for some reason unknown to me, there hasn't been much response. Maybe people don't want to “join up” on here, but I can't fathom any rational reason for this…
granville1
ParticipantHe must've read the wrong book! lol, there's more about Merrin in the novel.
Â
Yeah
Â
The famous shot of him under the streetlamp happens in the novel too!
Â
Yes, “his head bent patiently in the rain” or similar wording…
Â
The head spinning in the novel was probably a vision that Chris and Karras had.
Â
That's how I view it. I've bent backward at imdb trying to get this across. Some people think that “demonic” means “omnipotent”, e.g., contra Blatty, a full head spin would not kill the body of the demon's host because “who knows what a demon can do??” I maintain that we know what this particular demon can do, because the author has set limits on its power. The argument from “authorial authority” has mostly fallen on deaf ears…
June 6, 2012 at 2:36 PM in reply to: Regan’s silhouette against the window is in the novel- (for granville aka bastasch) #26133granville1
Participant“You must have missed that!”
Â
Yes, I did. Unfortunately, my reading is getting sloppier as time passes, for reasons known and unknown. Sorry I missed it, it was a crucial clue.
June 6, 2012 at 3:00 AM in reply to: Regan’s silhouette against the window is in the novel- (for granville aka bastasch) #26130granville1
ParticipantMy insistence that it's Karl at the window “for sure” was based on forgetting a point of information that you just now supplied, i.e.:
Â
Kinderman tells Chris in his second visit that he thought he saw Regan at the window, not Karl
Â
That piece of crucial information does seem to imply that Kinderman thought he saw a smaller person than Karl at the window. Good catch. So now I am inclined to agree with you that both Karl and Regan are “lithe”, but that it was most likely that Regan's silhouette was seen, not Karl's 🙂
June 5, 2012 at 4:04 AM in reply to: Regan’s silhouette against the window is in the novel- (for granville aka bastasch) #26127granville1
Participant“Would Kinderman really mistake a child for a grown, thickly muscled man? “
In the movie, it's clearly Regan.
Â
But in the novel, no mention is made of the size of the silhouette. Mention is only made of its motion, which is quick and lithe. In the novel, Blatty merely notes that Kinderman catches a glimpse of the silhouette. Blatty does not impute an interpretation to Kinderman, i.e., him thinking, “That must be Regan”. In fact, Chris has refused to let Kinderman see Regan because she is sedated and bed-ridden. So if Kinderman put an interpretation on the silhouette's identity, presumably his first thought would be of someone other than Regan.
June 5, 2012 at 1:03 AM in reply to: Regan’s silhouette against the window is in the novel- (for granville aka bastasch) #26125granville1
ParticipantI think it has to be Karl, since Karl is the only character whom Blatty himself consistently describes as “quick and lithe”:
Â
“a quick, lithe figure” …
per your citation.
Â
The novel: Karl enters:
Â
“Catting in lithe through a door off the pantry.”
(Bantam paperback, 1974, 35th printing, p. 16)
Â
And I do think that Karl would instinctively want to watch the cop from upstairs, to make sure he was really leaving and not sticking around to entrap Karl. Karl is acting suspiciously because he does have something to hide from Kinderman 🙂
May 24, 2012 at 8:11 PM in reply to: The Exorcist TV series greenlit, without Blatty and Friedkin #26095granville1
ParticipantVery strongly agreed 🙂
May 24, 2012 at 7:50 PM in reply to: The Exorcist TV series greenlit, without Blatty and Friedkin #26093granville1
ParticipantCappy, your idea of a two parter is far more appealing to me than the proposed schedule plan.
I also have a trepidation about who will play our beloved Damien. Miller created the perfect Karras and I don't know if modern producers/casting agents can be trusted. Hopefully it will be someone relatively unknown, and not some hunk picked up from a soap opera 😉
May 24, 2012 at 7:35 PM in reply to: The Exorcist TV series greenlit, without Blatty and Friedkin #26091granville1
ParticipantIt's a wonderful tale, but can a ten episode “stretch” really maintain the necessary shock and suspense?
Also, I hope they have actors whose skills equal those of the original film cast.
granville1
ParticipantGee, Sofia, I am so flattered 🙂
Â
But I bow to your knowledge of The Exorcist – you know that book by heart, plus you're a great scholar of the material, including the film.
-
AuthorPosts
CaptainHowdy.com The #1 Exorcist Fansite Since 1999