- This topic has 6 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 4 months ago by
Pazuzus Petals.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 12, 2008 at 11:59 PM #20046
Sofia
ParticipantYou’re wrong about Karl. He’s a religious man. In the first draft screenplay William Peter Blatty described his bedroom as having religious statues and a Sacred Heart painting on the wall. And in the novel, he blesses himself during the exorcism.
April 20, 2008 at 11:59 PM #20234Gabriel
ParticipantReading the novel really freaked me out: in my head, I blended it with the sounds and imagery from from the film and had nightmares for weeks!
October 2, 2009 at 11:59 PM #13231Bad Locust 77
ParticipantHaving seen the movie and its sequels numerous times, and having read a lot of articles and ‘scholarship’ on the film, I am now doing what I never dared to before: reading the novel! (I’ve already had a nightmare, and had to sleep with the TV on)
Already a few things are sticking out at me (and I haven’t finished the book yet, so it could all be going nowhere, but it is interesting to think about it).
The novel seems much more concerned with so-called ‘satanism’ and ‘Black Mass’ than the film. The ‘witchcraft’ book and Karras/Kinderman’s research all set the stage for us, as well as the time spent on details of the church desecration. The medium, Mary Jo Perrit (an interesting character that was dropped for the film) warns Chris McNeil about the Ouija. There’s also the suggestion that Regan read the book that Mary Jo Perrit brought her, thus influencing her possessed behavior.
I just found it odd that Karras expressed a belief in Black Masses being common in Europe. I know he’s a priest, but he’s also presented as a rational scientist, trying to painstakingly prove that there was nothing supernatural about Regan’s affliction. It was also kind of odd when he stated that psychokinesis was a common, scientifically provable occurrence. (Could that just be a product of the times? I know serious scholarly research into psychic phenomenon was common in the 60’s and 70’s).
Then there’s Karl. I don’t know the outcome of this subplot with his daughter and the drugs he stole at his previous job. But he is very fishy – and wasn’t it implied that he could have been planting various things in Regan’s room, such as the cross and the witchcraft book? So what was he doing? Dennings kept calling him a Nazi. The paint used in the church desecration matched Regan’s paints. Now I could either picture Regan levitating out of her window and breaking into the church at god knows what hour (plausible, but a “much too vulgar display of power” as the demon might say), or, did Karl do it? was Karl some sort of European satanist responsible for the possession? A bit too ‘Rosemary’s Baby’ of an idea that I don’t necessarily like, but there you go.
October 2, 2009 at 11:59 PM #22030LaPlumeDeMaTante
ParticipantI finished the novel the other day, I loved it! I also was influenced by the film as I saw it first, and tried to mix the descriptions together.
And it’s Mary Jo Perrin, by the way.
September 4, 2010 at 8:28 AM #23034DamienKarras
ParticipantI would have loved to see more of that relationship between Regan and Karl during the more severe stages of her illness. Just a though =P
September 5, 2010 at 4:57 AM #23035TheTunnel
ParticipantI just spend nearly all of today and this evening listening to the unabridged audiobook (11 cassettes!!) of “The Exorcist” as read by Blatty himself. There was a lot of material in the book that had to be cut out of the screenplay simply because of time restraints. I honestly don’t believe that Karl was involved in any of the demonic mayhem. It is hinted at in the film when Lee J. Cobb says his theory was that Burke Dennings was killed, then pushed from Regan’s window by a “very powerful man”, but the scene then jumps right to Ellen Burstyn’s realization that her daughter was the actual murderer. There is also a scene where Karl becomes phsically violent with Dennings after Burke, in a totally drunken state of mind, incessantly badgers Karl about being a Nazi, etc., but again, I don’t think Karl was responsible for any evil doings…This is an interesting thread though!!
June 20, 2011 at 5:25 PM #25302Pazuzus Petals
ParticipantBad Locust, right there with you! I just finished the novel for the first time.
Â
Yes, I share your annoyance that ideas like tele/psychokinesis and telepathy were considered to be part of the “rational, proven, scientific fact” side of Blatty's calculus while all the occult stuff was on the other side. But this was indeed a product of its time. During this time you had a lot of pseudoscience posing as real science in popular culture— “In Search Of” hosted by Leonard Nimoy (lending his logical veneer to the charade) comes to mind. A children's show called “The Tomorrow People” became popular in the 1970s, which posited that the next stage of human evolution would weild powers like telepathy and telekinesis. It was definitely something in the air around that time.
Â
Of course, by now we know that all these paranormal “scientific” claims had no validity at all.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
CaptainHowdy.com The #1 Exorcist Fansite Since 1999