- This topic has 28 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 17 years ago by
Jason Stringer.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 29, 2006 at 11:59 PM #15900
Justin
ParticipantHell no! 😛 SAW doesn’t even come close. If anything, it would be Romero’s Dead films.
October 30, 2006 at 11:59 PM #15901Pagan
ParticipantI have only seen the first Saw film but i will have to watch the other two some day. 😉
October 30, 2006 at 11:59 PM #15902Jenny
ParticipantI love Saw. I think it is the most original horror I have seen for ages. 2 wasnt too bad but not brill and hopefully seeing 3 this weekend with my daughter (the oldest one!).
November 1, 2006 at 11:59 PM #15909PatientX
ParticipantI haven’t seen the sequels yet, but I have to admit, the first one surprised me. All the hype had me braced for something insanely gory, so when I saw it was more story and puzzle-based, my first thought was ‘This is actually pretty cool’
Best horror saga after Exorcist? A bit too soon to say there…I say we give it more time and see where it goes…if, say, the rumors are true and they decide to try and continue (wouldn’t be the first time a horror franchise was dug up after saying it was over…)
…that could cost it.
November 4, 2006 at 11:59 PM #15918Greg
ParticipantSaw next to Exorcist? I have to totally disagree with you there, Mike (first time for everything 😉 of course). I hated the original film. If you want a film that has a jape (giant plot twist that becomes more important than the rest of the film) that is enough to destroy the credibility of the whole film, it’s Saw. I just didn’t see how a man could lie there the whole time pretending to be dead. There are a couple of things that are inevitable to happen while lying there long enough. Your stomach inevitably grumbles when you’ve haven’t eaten despite how much you may have eaten before fasting. The second thing is that if you lay still long enough without sleeping your body automatically starts to spasm its muscles to prevent from going numb. Considering a doctor was also in the room (and despite the fact how dead he looked, doctors would notice these things– like lack of riga mortis), makes it even less legitimate. Yes, films are supposed to suspend disbelief, but this was too unlikely. Cary Elwes was also his usual over-the-top self.
Torture pictures are just the next fad after the Slasher fad finally lost its steam. I would have thought it to be more likely that Exorcist fans would crave more psychological horror, and the Saw films are not really that at all– just pure gory showmanship without any real messages or subtext involved. I would be more inclined to agree more with Justin on Romero’s films although his last two don’t have anything as provocative to say as his original two films. Of course, I never saw Exorcist as a “saga.” And if a saga of good consistent installments doesn’t exist, then there is no best saga.
November 5, 2006 at 11:59 PM #15929Jenny
ParticipantOn the subject of Jigsaw laying there for hours, I have to agree that laying perfectly still for about 10 would be impossible but dont forget, Adam and the doctor (forgot his name!) thought he was dead from the first second they saw him. After a very short while they would ignore him because he is not helpful to their situation. Even when trying to get the tape machine etc they are not paying him any attention, they are just concentrating on what they need to get. Also, they are under extreme stress and spend a lot of their time crying, shouting, getting the hump with each other, trying to chop their own legs off or being in the dark! So the odd spasm probably would pass unnoticed. Last point is, that he had been in hospital for a long period of time so was used to lying down for long periods so it wouldnt be as hard for him as it would be for another person. Thats my argument so back at yer!!!
November 5, 2006 at 11:59 PM #15934Greg
ParticipantSorry Jenny, my dear. I don’t buy it. I was in the hospital myself lying down for a very long time (12 hours) as well. Staying mostly awake at the time and trying to be still in an attempt to sleep, it was impossible because I was in a very uncomfortable gurney and my body started to spasm. I was fasting too and my stomach would gurgle loudly every now and then. People could hear even when there was a fair amount of noise because a gurgle is very distinctive next to talking and yelling. Of course, the person has to be near you and he was. Doctors always notice that because they’re trained to not care about themselves and only others in need. His cellmate was just in need as him and that’s why he was always paying attention to what was happening across the room. Therefore, movement and stomach gurgling would still be caught in the peripheral and by ear when they got tired screaming.
November 8, 2006 at 11:59 PM #15943Jenny
ParticipantMmm I still think a lot would pass unnoticed. What does everyone else think?
November 8, 2006 at 11:59 PM #15944Justin
ParticipantI agree with everything Greg has said. 🙂
November 8, 2006 at 11:59 PM #15945Pagan
ParticipantI think Greg has the best ideas about this. 😀
November 8, 2006 at 11:59 PM #15946GhettoExorcist
ParticipantThe Exorcist saga the greatest of all time? Um with the first one aside did anyone see the mediocre sequels? The Exorcist II is not only one of the worst sequels of all time but would probably rank in the top 20 worst movies of all time. The Exorcist III had its redeeming quality but it’s not really a sequel than more of a spinoff. Both versions of the Exorcist IV were just eh. Schrader’s version was slightly better than Harlin’s version but still would not adequately round out the best horror saga of all time. So what we have is a near perfect original and a pretty decent spinoff. That’s hardly a saga. It’s too early to call Saw the greatest horror saga ever with yet another sequel due out next year but I must say I am impressed so far. My vote for right now would be The Evil Dead films.
November 9, 2006 at 11:59 PM #15951ManInKhakiExorcist
ParticipantValid points, all. Thank you.
And now my new thoughts…
The Exorcist series IS a saga; that is, the Friedkin, Blatty and Schrader entries. Despite the studio-sanctioned flaws and peculularities of the GOOD sequel and GOOD prequel, this trilogy (in my opinion) still tells a satisfying saga of good versus evil, what Blatty and Friedkin wanted all along (to show evil. And good.)
Unofficially the saga is really just the Friedkin original and Schrader prequel; a duo of films. They compliment one another more than even Legion does the 1973 film. Legion is the wildcard; it can be included, but isn’t missed too much; Dominion has more heart, even without Jason Miller or another “original” back in a role. Heart = care for the characters.
I guess no sequel is needed, and the fewer the better. But it’s too late; we have sequels. And all in all, the cream rises to the top, the drek drops to the bottom (with Legion left somewhere in between, in limbo).
Incidentally, it seems to me that Saw’s the Jigsaw studied at the same Career Killer school as Legion’s Gemini. The two are masters of… evil. Fine performances from Tobin Bell and Brad Dourif. Too bad Dourif couldn’t return for another two Exorcist sequels.
So ends my ramblings musings and opinions *. Feel free to comment. 🙂
M.I.K.E.
* Future edits are not out of the question. I typed this quite hastily, And the 24 hours has gone on for two many days; that is, this whole week has been one long day… without sleep!
November 11, 2006 at 11:59 PM #15957The Grudge Possible
ParticipantStanding alone, I still consider the Exorcist to be the greatest work of horror of all time, but as a saga, everything after the original except for Legion did not impress me; Heretic was just plain funny, The Beginning was a bad-digital-effects-plot-hole-fest, and Dominion, while it was decent in plot and script was kind of boring for me.
As far as SAW is concerned: I think the first two (I haven’t seen III) are fabulous, but I don’t place them in the horror genre. To me, the SAW series falls into the vein of thrillers like Se7en, Silence of the Lambs, etc.; movies that, while they have scary elements (SAW’s traps, Se7en’s murders, Buffalo Bill’s naked-dance in Silence of the Lambs), they’re more murder-mystery mindfucks than anything else. It’s not really correct, in my opinion, to compare the two, as they fall into different categories entirely.
And I’d be too busy thinking about how hot Shawnee Smith (Amanda in SAW) is to really compare the two, anyway.If you want to compare the Exorcist “saga”, compare it Romero’s “Dead” films, or Ginger Snaps, even Friday the 13th or Halloween, if you prefer. Or Myra Breckenridge (if anyone’s seen it, I’m sure they’ll agree it was terrifying); just make sure you’re comparing it to more closely-related films.
November 27, 2006 at 11:59 PM #16005Tyler Durden
ParticipantI LOVE the saw triology..but putting tin up there with The Exorcist …ummmmmm…well…no…if you were to put Saw next to anything it would with out a doubt be Se7en…and i actually don’t think u could place The Exorcist next to anything….it’s too deep for other horror film to be classed next to.
December 3, 2006 at 11:59 PM #16026Vess
ParticipantThe worst nanosecond of “The Heretic” and “Beginning” was better than both “Saws” combined… (I hear there was a third one recently – I doubt it can be any better than its predecessors, but fortunately I managed to avoid it)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
CaptainHowdy.com The #1 Exorcist Fansite Since 1999