- This topic has 19 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 2 months ago by
havigav617.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 12, 2011 at 3:15 AM #13824
granville1
ParticipantThe original theatrical cut has a scene when Kinderman enters Regan's room and goes to the window to look down to the bottom of the steps where Karras is lying. In this scene, shot from the exterior of the house, there is a very obvious “cross” on the left side of the shattered window, composed of the broken, shattered window debris. I always thought it was a great “faux-subliminal” shot suggestive of Karras' victory. Unfortunately, for reasons I do not understand, it does not exist in the “extended cut”. It is of such a nano-second duration, it could easily have been left in – and I miss it.
It appears at 1:29/1:56 here:
Â
May 12, 2011 at 7:14 AM #24990Justin
ParticipantJust checked my copies of both TVYNS and Extended Director's Cut and that shot is most definitely still there.
May 12, 2011 at 7:17 AM #24991granville1
ParticipantJustin said:
Just checked my copies of both TVYNS and Extended Director's Cut and that shot is most definitely still there.
Thanks, Justine, I will definitely check again :) I'd swear it was missing from the DC, but it might be some other version I saw … thanks.
EDIT: Of course, that s/b: “Thanks, Justin”. SHEESH, sorry about that.
May 15, 2011 at 6:17 AM #25033fatherbowdern
ParticipantWow … that's a great symbolic I never noticed … smart, smart, smart!
Father Bowdern
May 15, 2011 at 6:29 AM #25034granville1
ParticipantFather Bowdern said:
Wow … that's a great symbolic I never noticed … smart, smart, smart!
Father Bowdern
Ya know, I notice more potential symbolisms almost every tiime I watch it. Here's a stretch – in Iraq when Merrin heads to the Pazuzu amulet cavern, he walks down the wall of one of the excavated chambers. He “crosses” (sorry) an intersection of the walls and, so help me, it looks like he is “trampling on an inverted cross”. This impression was especially intense in full screen editions in which the “arms” of the “cross” are somewhat shortened; it is somewhat attenuated in widescreen, but (to my eye) it's still there. Like I said, it's a stretch, but it would be an interesting resonance with Merrin's pride … and it might darken the museum curator's words to Merrin, “Evil against evil” … i.e., Merrin as a prideful cross-trampler 😉
May 15, 2011 at 6:46 AM #25035fatherbowdern
ParticipantI'll look for that, granville, when I watch the film again. The one thing I've always noticed in the Northern Iraq scene are the men with their pickaxes hammering away at … nothing. Some will swing and hit dirt, while a small group never touches. I can never figure that one out because Friedkin was so meticulous. Of course, the actors could have been on a particular sacred ground where destruction was not allowed. I wish I had never noticed it …
Father Bowdern
May 15, 2011 at 6:50 AM #25036granville1
ParticipantFather Bowdern said:
I'll look for that, granville, when I watch the film again. The one thing I've always noticed in the Northern Iraq scene are the men with their pickaxes hammering away at … nothing. Some will swing and hit dirt, while a small group never touches. I can never figure that one out because Friedkin was so meticulous. Of course, the actors could have been on a particular sacred ground where destruction was not allowed. I wish I had never noticed it …
Father Bowdern
Thanks for that bit of data, Fr. Yes, next time I watch the movie, I will look for the hit-and-miss pickaxing. Thanks for the heads-up.
(Let me reiterate that you may not find the “cross-trampling Merrin” very credible. It's just that once I saw it, I keep looking for it, and it's always “there”.)
May 15, 2011 at 6:57 AM #25038fatherbowdern
Participantgran, could it be possible that it's Merrin's shadow (or perhaps that's what you're saying)? I don't doubt you a bit because Friedkin was so meticulous with every scene.
Father Bowdern
May 15, 2011 at 6:59 AM #25039granville1
ParticipantFather Bowdern said:
gran, could it be possible that it's Merrin's shadow (or perhaps that's what you're saying)? I don't doubt you a bit because Friedkin was so meticulous with every scene.
Father Bowdern
Could be his shadow, but it's not his shadow that I ever noticed :)Â Rather, it's the intersection of the wall-tops where he walks down the “upright” beam of the “cross” …
May 15, 2011 at 7:04 AM #25040fatherbowdern
ParticipantAh, got you … I will definitely look for this. BTW, I love those scenes in the Iraqi dig. Of particular note, whether by “nature or nurture,” I find it very unique that a fly lands on Merrin's hand when he inspects the Pazuzu amulet.
Father Bowdern
May 15, 2011 at 7:11 AM #25041granville1
ParticipantFather Bowdern said:
Ah, got you … I will definitely look for this. BTW, I love those scenes in the Iraqi dig. Of particular note, whether by “nature or nurture,” I find it very unique that a fly lands on Merrin's hand when he inspects the Pazuzu amulet.
Father Bowdern
Yes, like you say, whether by design or not, the sound engineers crank up the bee-buzzing around that moment, iirc – I thought it was flies buzzing until I found out it was really bees… first time I saw the Merrin fly and heard the bee-buzzing the thought popped into my mind, “How clever – suggesting Beelzebul, the 'Lord of the Flies'.”
Looking forward to more conversations, right now I need to head for bed.
May 17, 2011 at 2:38 AM #25062fatherbowdern
Participantgranville1 said:
Father Bowdern said:
Ah, got you … I will definitely look for this. BTW, I love those scenes in the Iraqi dig. Of particular note, whether by “nature or nurture,” I find it very unique that a fly lands on Merrin's hand when he inspects the Pazuzu amulet.
Father Bowdern
Yes, like you say, whether by design or not, the sound engineers crank up the bee-buzzing around that moment, iirc – I thought it was flies buzzing until I found out it was really bees… first time I saw the Merrin fly and heard the bee-buzzing the thought popped into my mind, “How clever – suggesting Beelzebul, the 'Lord of the Flies'.”
Looking forward to more conversations, right now I need to head for bed.
That's true about the bee-buzzing sound while Merrin breaks away the clumped soil and then brushes away a part of the dirt. I often played out a scenario in my mind that Friedkin intentionally had hundreds of flies released until he got that perfect shot. I guess I am truly easy to amuse with the musings running around in my head.
Father Bowdern
May 17, 2011 at 2:50 AM #25063granville1
ParticipantYes, the sound design terrified me in early viewings, then with TVYNS in the theater, the sound was incredibly enhanced, and all the more frightening – Friedkin did so much magic just with the soundtrack 🙂
May 17, 2011 at 3:12 AM #25065fatherbowdern
ParticipantI agree. I saw the 25th anniversary and the blu-ray version in theaters. I went to incredible theaters with outstanding sound. I do believe some of us were temporarily deaf after leaving the theater. I'd seen the movie a ton of times and I wasn't expecting the telephone ringing that scares Karras to ruffle my feathers as much as it did. Holy Cow! A theater employee said that WB's distribution channel asked for the loudest volume level as possible despite other films playing in the theater. I can’t imagine how the young kids felt when they passed the doors and heard some of Blatty’s incredible demonic dialogue.
Father Bowdern
May 17, 2011 at 3:48 AM #25066granville1
ParticipantI love it :)Â Ya know, that gunshot ALWAYS startles me, even when I remind myself it's coming. I liked the enhanced soundtrack but I'm not too hot on the new music which was played during the “Chris calls Howard” scene. I think it worked better in the “Kinderman tells Karras about the details of Dennings' death” walkabout scene – it's grim and a bit uncanny. But I think it plays too early in the Chris/call scene and delivers a sense of weirdness, when the scene – if it needs any music at all – seems to call for tonal pathos (mother angry FOR her child's feelings, daughter feeling abandoned)…
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.